![GEO, AEO, LLMO: Separating Fact from Fiction & How to Win AI Search [MozCon 2025 Speaker Series] - Moz](https://2quotes.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/geo-aeo-llmo-separating-fact-from-fiction-how-to-win-ai-search-mozcon-2025-speaker-series-moz-ebcxNHY8-thumb.jpg)
Table of Contents >> Show >> Hide
- The Acronym Translation Guide (So You Don’t Need a Decoder Ring)
- Separating Fact From Fiction (Because the Internet Loves a Scary Headline)
- Fiction #1: “SEO is dead. Long live GEO.”
- Fiction #2: “There’s a secret ‘optimize for ChatGPT’ meta tag.”
- Fiction #3: “Prompt engineering replaces content strategy.”
- Fact #1: AI search is expanding discovery, but traffic is changing shape
- Fact #2: “Cited” is the new “ranked” (for many query types)
- Fact #3: AI answers can be wrong (which makes authority matter more, not less)
- How AI Search Actually Chooses What to Say (Plain English Edition)
- The 12-Part Playbook to Win GEO, AEO, and LLMO Without Losing Your Mind
- 1) Write for extractability: answers first, fluff last
- 2) Create “quotable” blocks AI can reuse safely
- 3) Increase “fact density” with verifiable specifics
- 4) Build topic authority, not just page relevance
- 5) Make entities unambiguous (brands, products, people, places)
- 6) Technical SEO still mattersmaybe more than ever
- 7) Use structured data to reduce ambiguity (not as a ranking cheat)
- 8) Earn authority signals off-site (because AI reads the room)
- 9) Win the “comparison layer” with honest, structured differentiators
- 10) Publish content that other sources cite (be the source, not the summary)
- 11) Treat brand queries like a product feature
- 12) Measure AI visibility like it’s a channel (because it is)
- What “Winning” Looks Like in Google, Bing, and Chat-Based Search
- Risk, Ethics, and the Part Where We Don’t Ruin the Internet
- A Practical 30-Day Plan to Get Momentum
- Conclusion: The Real Secret to Winning AI Search
- Addendum: of Real-World “This Is What Works” Experience (Composite Patterns)
SEO has always had a talent for inventing new acronyms the way toddlers invent new ways to spill juice. But the 2025–2026 wave
(GEO! AEO! LLMO!) hit differently, because now the “search result” isn’t always a list of linksit’s a synthesized answer that
might quote your site, paraphrase your competitor, and then politely pretend it came up with everything on its own.
The good news: you don’t need to throw out SEO and replace it with “whatever a chatbot is into this week.”
The better news: if you stop chasing hype and start optimizing for how AI search actually retrieves, selects, and cites information,
you can win visibility in the new interfaces and keep earning clicks, leads, and revenue.
The Acronym Translation Guide (So You Don’t Need a Decoder Ring)
GEO: Generative Engine Optimization
GEO is typically framed as “optimize so your content gets used in AI-generated answers.” Think of it as earning a cameo in the
summaryideally with a citation, a link, and your brand name spelled correctly (a small but meaningful victory).
Academic research has also used “GEO” to describe tactics that increase the chance a generative engine includes particular sources,
facts, or phrasing when responding.
AEO: Answer Engine Optimization
AEO isn’t new; it’s SEO’s older cousin who’s been trying to get you to write clearer answers since the featured snippet era.
It’s about structuring content so engines can extract direct responses: definitions, steps, comparisons, pros/cons, and quick
explanations. In 2026, “answer engines” includes AI Overviews, generative SERP modules, voice assistants, and chat-based search.
LLMO: Large Language Model Optimization
LLMO is often used as shorthand for “how do we get LLMs to understand our brand and represent us accurately?”
That includes being cited in AI search, but also showing up when people ask brand/category questions (“best options,” “top tools,”
“what should I buy,” “what’s the safest choice,” etc.). LLMO overlaps with reputation, authority, and consistency across the web,
not just on your website.
Here’s the punchline: GEO, AEO, and LLMO aren’t three separate planets. They’re three camera angles on the same reality:
AI-driven discovery still depends on accessible content, credible sources, and clear answersjust packaged differently.
Separating Fact From Fiction (Because the Internet Loves a Scary Headline)
Fiction #1: “SEO is dead. Long live GEO.”
SEO is not dead. It’s… evolving in public, which makes it look dramatic. AI search experiences still rely on crawling, indexing,
retrieval, and ranking. In other words, the foundations of SEO still power the pipelineAI just changes the interface and the
way traffic is distributed.
Fiction #2: “There’s a secret ‘optimize for ChatGPT’ meta tag.”
If someone sells you a “one weird tag” solution, congratulations: you’ve found a time traveler from 2007. Most “AI optimization”
wins come from making content easier to retrieve, trust, and citenot from a magic incantation in your <head>.
Fiction #3: “Prompt engineering replaces content strategy.”
Prompts can help you test what AI search returns. But prompts don’t replace the work of building authoritative content,
earning mentions, and creating pages that answer real questions better than everyone else.
Fact #1: AI search is expanding discovery, but traffic is changing shape
Multiple industry datasets show AI-referred traffic is still relatively small in aggregate for most sites, but it’s growing,
concentrated on high-intent pages, and behaving differently than classic organic. Translation: don’t panicinstrument.
Fact #2: “Cited” is the new “ranked” (for many query types)
In classic SEO, the win was position. In AI search, the win is often: “Was my brand included, quoted, or cited?” Because if a user
gets a synthesized answer, they may click fewer linksor click only the most compelling, credible citations.
Fact #3: AI answers can be wrong (which makes authority matter more, not less)
AI summaries can misquote, overgeneralize, or confidently say nonsense with the energy of someone who read half a headline and
decided that was enough. That risk pushes engines to rely on reputable sources, clear signals, and pages that demonstrate
expertise and accountability.
How AI Search Actually Chooses What to Say (Plain English Edition)
Most AI search experiences follow a pattern that looks like this:
- Interpret the intent (what is the user truly asking?).
- Retrieve sources (often from the web index, sometimes with multiple related queries).
- Rank and filter (quality, relevance, safety, duplication, trust signals).
- Synthesize an answer (summarize, compare, explain).
- Attach citations/links (varies by platform and query type).
Google has described AI Overviews as providing key information with links to learn more on the web, and also provides guidance
for site owners on how AI features interact with content. Microsoft’s Copilot Search in Bing emphasizes citations and publisher
visibility within generative responses. And ChatGPT’s search experience is designed to surface timely information with links to
sources when it chooses (or is prompted) to browse the web.
If you’re trying to “win AI search,” you’re really trying to win at two layers:
(1) retrieval (getting selected as a source) and (2) synthesis
(getting used and cited in the generated answer).
The 12-Part Playbook to Win GEO, AEO, and LLMO Without Losing Your Mind
1) Write for extractability: answers first, fluff last
Put the direct answer near the top. Use short paragraphs, clear headings, and “definition-style” sentences.
If your best explanation is buried under a 900-word preamble about the history of the internet, AI will summarize your competitor
who got to the point.
- Good: “Generative Engine Optimization is the practice of improving how often your content is cited in AI-generated answers.”
- Less good: “Since the dawn of time, humans have sought answers…”
2) Create “quotable” blocks AI can reuse safely
AI systems love compact, factual, self-contained chunks: steps, checklists, tables (when appropriate), pros/cons, and FAQs with
precise wording. Think “copy/paste friendly,” but for machines.
3) Increase “fact density” with verifiable specifics
Replace vague claims with concrete details: measurements, thresholds, definitions, and constraints. This isn’t about stuffing stats
everywhereit’s about being the page that settles the question. When engines synthesize, they prefer sources that look confident
for good reasons.
4) Build topic authority, not just page relevance
AI retrieval often pulls multiple sources to assemble an overview. The brands that show up repeatedly across subtopics tend to
become “default picks.” Build clusters: core guide + supporting pages that answer adjacent questions and link to each other.
5) Make entities unambiguous (brands, products, people, places)
AI can’t “know what you meant” if your site is inconsistent. Use the same brand name, product names, and terminology everywhere.
Add a crisp About page, author pages, editorial policies, and clear ownership/attribution.
6) Technical SEO still mattersmaybe more than ever
If content can’t be reliably crawled, rendered, and understood, it can’t be retrieved and cited. Keep your basics tight:
clean internal linking, indexable pages, canonical discipline, fast templates, and minimal “content hidden behind interactions.”
7) Use structured data to reduce ambiguity (not as a ranking cheat)
Structured data can help systems interpret what a page is about (organization, product, article, how-to concepts, etc.).
It’s not a “guarantee me an AI citation” button, but it can support clarityespecially for brands, products, reviews, and entities.
8) Earn authority signals off-site (because AI reads the room)
LLM-based systems learn from the broader web ecosystem: reputable mentions, consistent references, and third-party validation.
Digital PR, partnerships, expert contributions, and credible citations from other sites can matter as much as on-page tweaks.
9) Win the “comparison layer” with honest, structured differentiators
AI search is obsessed with comparison queries: “best,” “vs,” “alternatives,” “worth it,” and “which should I choose.”
Create pages that compare options fairly, explain trade-offs, and include who each option is for. This is where citations drive
real clicks, because users want proof.
10) Publish content that other sources cite (be the source, not the summary)
Original research, benchmarks, calculators, datasets, and expert interviews create “linkable and citeable” assets.
If your site becomes a referenced source in your niche, AI systems have more reasons to retrieve you.
11) Treat brand queries like a product feature
People ask AI about brands the way they ask friends: “Is this legit?” “What’s the warranty?” “Who is this for?”
Create a branded Q&A hub that answers concerns, comparisons, pricing context, and common objections. If your site doesn’t answer
branded questions, someone else willpossibly with a creative interpretation of reality.
12) Measure AI visibility like it’s a channel (because it is)
Set up analytics views for referrals from AI tools, and track conversions from that traffic. Also monitor “share of voice” in
AI answers by topic: ask consistent prompts, record which brands are cited, and watch how results change after content updates.
What “Winning” Looks Like in Google, Bing, and Chat-Based Search
Google AI Overviews: earn inclusion through helpful, reliable content
Google’s guidance to site owners emphasizes creating helpful, people-first content and understanding how AI features may include
your pages. If your content is clear, accessible, and trustworthy, you increase the odds of being retrieved and cited.
Also: you can control some snippet behavior with established mechanisms (like robots directives and text-level snippet controls)
when appropriate. Use them carefullyhiding everything from snippets is like building a bookstore and covering the windows with
plywood because you’re afraid someone might read.
Bing Copilot Search: citations are the battleground
Bing’s generative experiences have emphasized source visibility, often surfacing citations prominently. That means your page needs
to be the kind of source a system feels safe quoting: specific, well-structured, and aligned with what users actually ask.
ChatGPT Search and similar tools: the “link moment” is when trust spikes
When chat-based search provides links, users tend to click for verification, depth, or shopping decisions. Pages that are easy to
verify (clear authorship, dates, sources, definitions, and transparency) tend to be more “citation-ready.”
Risk, Ethics, and the Part Where We Don’t Ruin the Internet
If you’re tempted to “optimize” by trying to trick models into saying false things about your competitors or inventing credentials
for your branddon’t. Aside from being unethical, it’s fragile. Platforms are actively improving safeguards, and reputational
damage lasts longer than your brief moment of spammy glory.
The bigger issue is trust. Publishers and regulators have raised concerns about how AI summaries use content and how traffic is
redistributed. Whether you’re a brand or a publisher, the long-term winners will be the sites that invest in credibility and make
it easy for both humans and machines to verify the truth.
A Practical 30-Day Plan to Get Momentum
Week 1: Audit for “AI readiness”
- Identify your top 25 questions (non-branded and branded) and test them in AI search experiences.
- Map which pages are currently cited (if any) and which competitors are getting mentioned.
- Check technical accessibility: indexing, rendering, internal links, and content hidden behind scripts.
Week 2: Rewrite key pages for extractability
- Add direct answers up top, tighten headings, and create succinct definition blocks.
- Turn rambling paragraphs into steps, bullets, and “when/why/how” sections.
- Strengthen evidence: add clear sources, expert review where appropriate, and updated timestamps.
Week 3: Build topic clusters and comparison assets
- Create supporting pages for sub-questions and link them strategically.
- Publish comparison and alternatives content that’s honest and useful.
- Invest in one “source-worthy” asset (research, calculator, dataset, benchmark).
Week 4: Measurement and iteration
- Create an “AI referrals” view in analytics and track conversions.
- Track AI visibility by topic (simple spreadsheet works; fancy tools optional).
- Refresh content that’s getting impressions but not citations: improve clarity and credibility.
Conclusion: The Real Secret to Winning AI Search
GEO, AEO, and LLMO aren’t a replacement for SEOthey’re a reminder of what SEO was always supposed to be:
make the best, clearest, most trustworthy answer easy to find and easy to use.
AI just raises the stakes, because now engines don’t merely rank pagesthey reuse them.
If you want your brand to show up in the new search interfaces, focus on being the source AI wants to cite:
specific, structured, credible, and refreshingly helpful. Do that consistently, and the acronyms can do whatever they want.
You’ll still win.
Addendum: of Real-World “This Is What Works” Experience (Composite Patterns)
Below are three common patterns teams report when they start treating AI search as a real channel. These are composite scenarios
(not one specific company), but they reflect what repeatedly shows up in audits, case studies, and platform behavior in 2025–2026.
Scenario 1: The B2B SaaS Brand That Kept Getting “Almost Mentioned”
The problem wasn’t rankingsthis brand ranked well for several category terms. The problem was that AI answers kept summarizing the
category using competitors as examples. The fix was surprisingly unglamorous: the team rebuilt their core “What is X?” and “How does X work?”
pages to be aggressively clear. They added a definition paragraph, a 7-step “how it works” section, a short comparison table of approaches,
and an FAQ that mirrored real sales-call objections.
Then they did something most teams skip: they wrote a “Brand + category” explainer page that answered the questions AI users ask out loud:
“Who is this for?” “What’s the learning curve?” “What does pricing typically look like?” “How does it compare to alternatives?”
Over several weeks of re-testing prompts, the brand began appearing more consistentlyfirst as a citation, then as an example in the explanation.
The takeaway: AI search rewards pages that sound like the best-informed salesperson in the room, minus the pushiness.
Scenario 2: The Health/Wellness Publisher That Needed Trust Signals, Not More Words
In sensitive topics, AI systems appear to lean harder on credibility and clarity. This publisher already had long articles, but the
“answer” was scattered across anecdotes and tangents. They added medical review notes, clearer author bios, a “key takeaways” block,
and more precise language around what evidence does and doesn’t say. They also improved internal linking so the “main guide” connected
to symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment pages in a structured way.
The result wasn’t just better chances of being cited; it was fewer user drop-offs. When AI referred traffic did land, it stayed longer,
because the page immediately confirmed: “Yes, you’re in the right placeand here’s the safe, accurate explanation.”
The takeaway: in AI search, trust isn’t a vibe. It’s a visible set of signals.
Scenario 3: The eCommerce Site That Won by Making Product Facts Easy to Extract
For shopping and “best of” queries, AI answers often pull hard specs and clear differentiators. The brand improved product detail pages
with consistent specs, compatibility notes, sizing guidance, and short “why choose this” bullets. They also published comparison pages that
admitted trade-offs (which ironically boosted trust). Instead of generic copy, they used crisp, verifiable statements:
what it is, what it does, what it’s made of, who it’s for, and what to watch out for.
Over time, the brand started appearing in “which should I buy?” AI answersnot always as the top recommendation, but often as a cited option.
And that was enough to move revenue, because the clicks they did get were high-intent and closer to purchase.
The takeaway: if AI can’t quickly extract the product story, it will choose a product story it can.
The shared theme across all three: winning AI search rarely requires a new gimmick. It requires making your best information easier to retrieve,
safer to cite, and more useful the moment a human lands on the page.
