Nurses are asked to do a lot: deliver complex care, educate families, coordinate across teams, catch subtle safety risks,
and somehow still remember where the bladder scanner wandered off to. When the workforce is stretched thin, technology
shouldn’t be “one more thing.” It should act like a quiet, reliable teammatehandling repetitive tasks, surfacing the right
information at the right time, and reducing the friction that turns a normal shift into a 12-hour obstacle course.

The goal isn’t to replace nursing judgment (good luck with that). The goal is to support it: fewer preventable errors,
faster decisions, better communication, and less time spent wrestling with systems that feel like they were designed by
someone who’s never tried charting while answering a call light. Done well, nurse-supporting technology can strengthen
patient safety, protect clinician well-being, and help hospitals deliver smarter care with the workforce they have.

Why the nurse workforce needs tech that actually helps

Health systems across the U.S. are navigating staffing pressure, rising patient acuity, and administrative load.
Documentation burden and EHR usability issues are persistent themes in clinician burnout discussions, and nursing is not
immune. When minutes matter, the difference between “supportive tech” and “tech tax” shows up quickly: delayed meds,
missed cues, duplicated work, and a team that feels like it’s sprinting on a treadmill.

Technology becomes workforce support when it does three things consistently:
(1) reduces avoidable work (the copy-paste-and-pray category),
(2) improves reliability in high-risk steps (like medication administration),
and (3) strengthens teamwork and visibility (so problems are found earlier, not later).
In other words: less chaos, more clarity.

First principles: nurse-centered technology (not vendor-centered)

Before buying anything with a dashboard, start with principles. These aren’t “nice to haves.” They’re what separates
safer care delivery from expensive frustration.

Design for real workflows, not ideal workflows

A tool that works in a demo but fails during admissions, discharges, and peak call-bell hours is not a clinical toolit’s
a stress generator. Include bedside nurses, charge nurses, nurse educators, and informatics nurses early. If the system
makes it harder to do the right thing, people will route around it. That’s not “noncompliance.” That’s survival.

Reduce cognitive load and interruptions

Smart care doesn’t mean more alerts. It means fewer, better alertsones tied to action and context. Alert fatigue is real,
and noisy systems can create safety risks by drowning out what matters. A safer technology strategy respects attention as
a limited resource.

Make safety the default path

The safest process should also be the easiest process. For example, medication safety tools should make it simpler to
confirm the right patient and right medication than to bypass verification. When staff feel forced into workarounds,
systems often need redesignnot more reminders.

Interoperability is workforce support

When systems don’t share data smoothly, nurses become the integration enginere-entering information, chasing missing
results, and reconciling conflicting lists. Interoperability rules and standards matter because they reduce duplicate work
and improve continuity across settings.

Technology that supports nurses and strengthens patient safety

1) Medication safety: build a “layered defense,” not a single point of failure

Medication administration is a high-frequency, high-risk workflowmeaning small improvements compound into meaningful
safety gains. Many organizations use a layered approach:

• CPOE with clinical decision support to reduce prescribing and transcribing errors.
• eMAR (electronic medication administration record) to improve visibility and timing accuracy.
• Barcode medication administration (BCMA) to verify patient and medication at the bedside.
• Smart infusion pumps with dose error reduction software (DERS) to help keep infusions within defined limits.

BCMA is a practical example of tech that helps nurses do what they already aim to do: match the right med to the right
patient at the right time. Evidence shows medication administration errors can decrease after BCMA implementation when
it’s implemented thoughtfully and supported by workflow design. Smart infusion pumps can also reduce risk, but only when
drug libraries are well governed and bypass behavior is addressed. The tech is the seatbelt; governance is the habit of
wearing it.

Specific example: A med-surg unit sees frequent late-night IV antibiotic starts. By improving order-to-admin
visibility (CPOE + eMAR), reinforcing bedside verification (BCMA), and standardizing pump libraries (DERS), the team
reduces “last-minute scramble” starts and catches mismatched doses earlier. The biggest win isn’t the gadgetit’s fewer
surprise moments that create risk.

2) Documentation burden relief: optimize the EHR before buying shiny add-ons

“Smarter” care delivery often begins with boring work: removing unnecessary clicks. EHR optimization can include:

• Streamlined flowsheets and smart phrases that reflect nursing practice (not billing puzzles).
• Auto-population of vitals, device data, and routine measures where appropriate.
• Cleaner medication reconciliation workflows with clearer responsibility handoffs.
• Reducing duplicate documentation across modules that don’t talk to each other.

Emerging toolslike ambient documentation or AI-assisted note draftingmay reduce time spent charting for some
clinicians, but they require careful governance, privacy review, and “trust but verify” monitoring. The point is to free
nurses for patient care, not to create a new category of “AI babysitting.”

Practical rule: If a new tool adds 20 seconds to a task that happens 60 times a shift, it’s not “minor.”
That’s 20 minutes. Nurses feel math.

3) Communication and coordination: faster isn’t always safer

Secure messaging, mobile communication apps, and team coordination platforms can reduce phone-tag and improve response
time. But they can also create message overload, fragmented conversations, and the illusion that “a text = closed loop.”
Safer communication tech supports:

• Escalation logic (what needs a call, what can be a message, what needs an in-person huddle).
• Read-back/confirmation workflows for high-risk communications.
• Alarm management strategies to reduce non-actionable noise and prevent missed critical alarms.

The best systems don’t just deliver messagesthey help teams communicate reliably under pressure.

4) Virtual nursing and telehealth: extend expertise without stretching the bedside

Virtual nursing modelsoften supported by a command-center setup and EHR accesscan shift certain tasks away from the
bedside nurse at peak moments. Common use cases include admissions history, discharge education, patient safety
surveillance, mentoring newer staff, and supporting rounding. This approach can also create flexible roles for experienced
nurses who may need remote or lower-lift options, helping retain talent.

Success depends on inclusivity, workflow redesign, relationship-building, and reliable infrastructure (like bandwidth and
device placement). Done thoughtfully, virtual nursing can be a “force multiplier”not by making nurses do more, but by
making the system waste less of their time.

5) Smart rooms, remote monitoring, and “quiet automation”

Smart beds, fall-risk sensors, automated vital sign capture, and remote monitoring can strengthen early detection and
reduce repetitive manual tasks. The key is to avoid turning the unit into a casino of flashing lights. A safer approach:

• Define which signals matter (and which create noise).
• Route alerts to the right role with clear action guidance.
• Integrate device data into the EHR so nurses aren’t toggling between five screens.

When implemented well, these tools support situation awareness: noticing deterioration earlier, preventing falls, and
supporting timely interventions.

6) Workforce operations tech: staffing analytics that respect reality

Scheduling platforms and staffing analytics can help forecast demand, match skill mix to acuity, and reduce last-minute
scrambling. But staffing tech should never become “algorithm says no” management. Nurses know when assignments are unsafe,
even if the spreadsheet is feeling confident.

Better models incorporate acuity indicators, admit/discharge patterns, and real constraints like orientation status and
charge nurse load. They also support flexible pools and team-based care models that reduce burnout by improving fairness
and predictability.

Safety, privacy, and governance: the guardrails that make “smart” actually safe

AI governance and patient safety

AI can assist with triage, documentation, and risk detectionbut it can also introduce new risks if it’s poorly governed.
Organizations increasingly emphasize strong oversight: clear accountability, bias monitoring, incident reporting, and
training staff to treat AI as a tool rather than an authority. The safest posture is “assistive, not absolute.”

Cybersecurity is a patient safety issue

Connected devices and integrated systems expand the attack surface. Healthcare safety organizations and regulators have
repeatedly highlighted cybersecurity risks because outages and compromised devices can delay care and create error-prone
workarounds. A nurse-supporting technology plan includes:

• Vendor security requirements and ongoing patch processes.
• Network segmentation and device inventory controls.
• Downtime workflows that are actually practiced (not just stored in a binder that nobody can find).

Smart pump governance and alarm strategy

For smart infusion pumps and alarm systems, governance is not optional. Drug libraries must be maintained, overrides
monitored, and alarm settings routinely reviewed to keep alerts actionable. Otherwise, safety tools can degrade into
background noise.

An implementation playbook that respects nursing time

Step 1: Start with measurable outcomes (and pick a few)

Choose outcomes that matter to nurses and patients, such as:
time spent on documentation per shift, medication administration error rates, infusion safety events, fall rates, response
times, overtime hours, and nurse satisfaction/retention indicators. Avoid “we installed it” as a success metric.

Step 2: Co-design with nurses and nurse informaticists

Include bedside nurses, educators, and informatics specialists in selection, build, and testing. Nursing informatics is
built around connecting clinical practice with information systemsexactly what’s needed to prevent usability problems
from becoming safety problems.

Step 3: Pilot, learn, and fix the workflow (not the nurse)

Pilots should be long enough to encounter real conditions: admissions surges, staffing variability, and night shift
realities. Track workarounds and friction points as signals of system design gaps. If the fix is “try harder,” it’s
probably not a fix.

Step 4: Train for competency, not exposure

Effective training includes superusers, quick-reference guides, simulation-based practice for high-risk workflows (like
infusion programming), and ongoing refreshers. One-and-done training is how “smart” becomes “mysterious.”

Step 5: Sustain with governance and continuous improvement

Build feedback loops: frontline reporting, monthly optimization reviews, and clear ownership for device libraries,
documentation standards, and alert tuning. The best tech programs treat go-live as the beginning, not the finish line.

Where this is headed: the next wave of nurse-supporting technology

Over the next few years, hospitals will likely continue expanding virtual care models, improving interoperability, and
testing assistive AI toolsespecially those aimed at documentation relief and proactive safety surveillance. The winning
strategies will be the ones that stay grounded in nursing realities: fewer clicks, fewer interruptions, clearer
coordination, and safer defaults.

In short: smarter care delivery isn’t about being high-tech. It’s about being high-functioning.

Experiences from the floor: what “supportive technology” feels like in real life (and what can go wrong)

Picture a weekday on a busy med-surg unit. The whiteboard is full, the admission queue is not shy, and the call lights
have apparently formed a union. The hospital recently rolled out a “nurse-supporting” technology bundle. Everyone is
hopeful. Everyone is also emotionally prepared for disappointment, because hope is not a strategy.

The first noticeable change is barcode medication administration. At first, it’s annoying in the way all good safety
practices are annoying: it slows you down just enough to make you notice the clock. But then something subtle happens.
A nurse scans a patient wristband and the system flags a mismatchsame last name, different first name, rooms close
together. That’s the kind of error nobody plans to make and everybody is capable of making. The scan catches it early,
with zero drama, and the nurse gets to keep their confidence intact. The unit learns quickly that the scanner isn’t
judgingit’s backing you up.

Next comes smart infusion pump optimization. Before, the pump library was technically available, but overrides happened
so often it felt like a speedrun. Leadership decided to treat overrides as data, not disobedience. They found certain
limits were unrealistic for common therapies, and some concentrations weren’t updated. After governance workupdating the
library, clarifying standards, and retraining on the “why”override rates drop. The pump starts behaving less like a
nagging roommate and more like an actually helpful guardrail. Nurses trust it because it’s consistent, not because a
poster told them to.

The biggest relief, though, comes from small EHR changes. A documentation committeeheavy on bedside nurses, not just
“people who like meetings”removes duplicate fields, fixes a flowsheet that required three clicks to say “patient turned,”
and auto-imports device vitals when appropriate. No fireworks. Just fewer tiny cuts throughout the day. By the end of a
week, nurses describe it the same way people describe good shoes: you notice because it stops hurting.

Then the unit tries secure messaging and a new mobile alert system. At first it feels like progress: faster responses,
fewer overhead pages, fewer frantic phone calls. But within days, the message volume spikes. Nurses start receiving
non-urgent messages during med pass. A “quick question” becomes a five-thread conversation with no clear owner. The team
realizes that faster communication without structure can create new risk. They introduce simple rules: high-risk issues
require a call; urgent changes require confirmation; non-urgent topics go to a scheduled huddle. Suddenly the tech feels
supportive againbecause the workflow got smarter, not because the app got shinier.

Finally, the hospital pilots virtual nursing. A remote nurse helps with admissions history and discharge teaching, and
keeps an eye on safety protocols during high-volume hours. The bedside staff is skeptical at first (“So… a nurse on a
screen?”), but they warm up when they see the benefit: fewer interruptions during procedures, better patient education,
and faster discharge readiness. The virtual nurse also mentors newer staffreviewing documentation patterns, answering
questions without making anyone feel small, and catching early signs that a patient’s condition is changing. It doesn’t
replace bedside nursing. It protects it.

The lesson from these experiences is consistent: supportive technology succeeds when it is designed with nurses, tuned
to real workflows, governed like a safety program (not a one-time purchase), and measured by outcomes that matter.
Nurses don’t need a future full of gadgets. They need a present full of fewer obstacles. When technology removes friction
and strengthens safety, the shift still isn’t easybut it becomes more doable, more reliable, and a little more human.

Conclusion

Adopting technology to support the nurse workforce is not about chasing trendsit’s about building systems that reduce
burden and improve safety at the same time. The best solutions strengthen medication safety, streamline documentation,
improve communication, expand virtual care capacity, and protect patients through strong governance and cybersecurity.
When hospitals treat nurses as co-designers and measure success in time saved, errors prevented, and teams supported,
technology becomes what it should have been all along: a practical partner in smarter, safer care delivery.

The post Adopting technology to support the nurse workforce and provide smarter, safer care delivery appeared first on Quotes Today.

The emergency room is a weird place: it’s part life-saving pit crew, part air-traffic control tower, and part “why is the vending machine out of pretzels again?”
If you’ve ever been in an ER, you know the vibe can swing from calm to chaos in the time it takes a blood pressure cuff to inflate.

The good news: a lot of today’s emergency department (ED) technology isn’t about adding more screens for staff to stare at (though… yes, there are screens).
The best tech is the kind that quietly makes your visit safer, clearer, and less stressfulwithout you needing an IT degree or a secret password.

Let’s break down the three biggest ways technology in the ER boosts the patient experiencewhat it is, how it works, and what it feels like from the patient side.

1) Faster, safer decisions with connected records, smart ordering, and barcode checks

In an emergency, time mattersbut so does accuracy. The ER doesn’t just need “fast.”
It needs “fast, correct, and consistent,” which is basically the holy trinity of not making a bad day worse.

Instant access to your story (even when you can’t tell it)

Electronic health records (EHRs) and health information exchange help clinicians see critical details quickly: medications, allergies, problem lists,
prior visits, recent labs, imaging, and discharge notes. When this information is available at the point of care, it can reduce delays,
prevent repeat tests, and help teams make better decisionsespecially when patients are in pain, confused, or unable to speak for themselves.
Sources:

Example: A patient comes in with shortness of breath and a history of heart failure. If the ER team can quickly confirm prior echocardiogram results,
recent medication changes, and previous hospitalizations, they can tailor treatment sooner. That can mean fewer “let’s re-do everything” steps,
and more “let’s do the right thing first” steps.

Another big patient-experience win: care coordination. When the ED can share or retrieve information across settings (primary care, specialists,
pharmacies, other hospitals), handoffs tend to be smootherand patients spend less time repeating their life story like a podcast with no skip button.
Sources:

Clinical decision support: the quiet double-checker

Many EHR systems include clinical decision supportalerts and prompts that help reduce common errors and improve safety.
Think: drug-allergy warnings, medication interaction flags, reminders for evidence-based protocols, and order sets that standardize care during high-pressure moments.
Done well, this is like having a calm second set of eyes in a loud room.
Sources:

That matters for patient experience because safety is experience. Patients might not see the alert pop up, but they feel the result:
fewer mix-ups, more consistent care, and less “wait, what medication did you say you take again?”

Barcodes and wristbands: fewer “Oops” moments

Barcode medication administration (BCMA) is one of the most practical safety technologies in hospitals.
The basic idea: scan the patient’s wristband and the medication to confirm the right patient, right drug, right dose, right time, and right route.
Studies and patient-safety reviews have found that barcode-based processes can reduce medication administration errors.
Sources:

This pairs nicely with patient identification best practiceslike using at least two identifiers (for example, name and date of birth) before giving medications,
drawing labs, or doing procedures. It may feel repetitive when staff ask you the same questions again and again, but it’s a feature, not a bug.
Sources:

Patient experience translation: fewer errors, fewer delays caused by re-checking, and more confidence that the care team is getting it right.
(Also, that little barcode scanner “beep” is basically the sound of your safety net tighteningcomforting, in a slightly robotic way.)

2) Less uncertainty with real-time updates and clearer communication

Ask people what they dislike most about an ER visit, and you’ll hear some variation of:
“I didn’t know what was happening,” “I didn’t know how long it would take,” and “I didn’t know who to ask.”
Technology can’t erase every delaybut it can reduce the stress that comes from uncertainty.

Tracking tools and smarter flow: fewer lost minutes (and fewer lost humans)

EDs use patient-tracking tools to improve “patient flow”the movement from arrival to triage to testing to treatment to discharge or admission.
Some hospitals use real-time location systems (RTLS) or similar tracking approaches to help staff locate patients, equipment, and care teams,
which can reduce bottlenecks and improve coordination.
Sources:

Even when patients never see the behind-the-scenes dashboards, they feel the improvements:

• Less time waiting for someone to find equipment or an open room
• Fewer “we’re still trying to track down…” delays
• More predictable steps (triage → labs → imaging → results → plan)

A smoother process doesn’t just help the hospital run betterit makes the patient experience feel more organized and less random.
In the ER, “organized” is a love language.

Wait-time transparency: the magic is being kept informed

Some EDs communicate updates through digital signage, estimated wait-time displays, or text-message systems that let patients receive updates
and sometimes wait in a less crowded area. Research on SMS-based updates in ED settings has explored improving satisfaction with wait time,
largely by changing the experience of waitingbecause informed waiting is less frustrating than silent waiting.
Sources:

This isn’t about pretending the wait is shorter. It’s about reducing the emotional tax of “What’s going on?”
A simple message like “Lab results are pending; next step is provider evaluation” can be surprisingly calming.

And it helps families too. When loved ones aren’t guessing, they’re less likely to panic, hover, or spiral into worst-case scenarios
based solely on the fact that it’s been 45 minutes and no one has appeared.

Clearer bedside communication: digital tools, whiteboards, and shared plans

“Communication boards” (sometimes literal whiteboards, sometimes digital equivalents) are used to keep patients updated on care team members,
plan-of-care details, and next steps. Patient-safety and patient-experience resources note that tools like this can support patient-centered communication
and reduce confusionespecially in busy hospital environments.
Sources:

In ER terms, the best communication is:

• Specific: “We’re waiting on your CT scan results” beats “We’ll see.”
• Honest: “It may take another hour” beats “Soon.”
• Actionable: “If your pain changes, hit the call button” beats “Try to relax.”

Technology helps create a single, consistent story so you don’t get three different answers from three different people,
whichlet’s be realcan make patients feel like they’re in the plot of a medical mystery show they didn’t sign up to binge.

3) A more human visit through virtual care, remote monitoring, and accessibility tech

Here’s the twist: some of the best ER technology doesn’t make care feel more “high-tech.”
It makes care feel more human by reducing friction, improving access, and helping patients understand what’s happening.

Virtual triage and “provider in triage”: faster evaluation and better prioritization

A growing approach in emergency medicine is using telehealth or virtual provider models to improve throughputlike virtual provider triage
or technology-supported “fast track” workflows. Research in emergency medicine has described how virtual triage programs can improve efficiency
and affect outcomes like “left without being seen,” which matters because leaving before evaluation is a bad outcome for both safety and experience.
Sources:

What this looks like in real life:

• A clinician evaluates you sooner (sometimes via video) to start orders earlylabs, imaging, pain control, or EKGs.
• You may get moved to the right pathway faster (urgent care referral, discharge with follow-up, or full ED workup).
• The ED can reserve rooms for patients who truly need them, which can reduce crowding and delays.

Patient experience translation: less limbo, more progress. Even if the total visit is still long, the first meaningful step happens sooner.
And psychologically, that’s huge.

Remote monitoring and smarter alerts: safer care without constant interruptions

Modern monitoring includes wireless or centralized systems that help teams detect changes soonerlike oxygen saturation drops, heart rate changes,
or abnormal vital sign trends. Not every ED uses the same tools, but the general trend is clear: better monitoring supports earlier intervention,
which improves safety and can reduce the “wait until it gets worse” risk.

It can also reduce unnecessary interruptions. When staff have clearer data and smarter alerts, they may not need to “pop in” as frequently just to re-check
something that a connected monitor is already tracking. That means fewer disruptions for resting patients and fewer anxious “is something wrong?” moments
when someone rushes into the room unexpectedly.

Accessibility and understanding: language support, discharge clarity, and portals

A good ER visit isn’t just about what happens in the departmentit’s about what you understand when you leave.
Patient-facing digital tools (including patient portals and electronic after-visit summaries) can support engagement by making instructions,
results, and follow-up plans easier to access and revisit. Research on patient portals has found associations with patient engagement and perceived usefulness,
though adoption and usability vary widely.
Sources:

Add language access tools (like video interpretation or on-demand interpreter services), and the patient experience improves in a very basic, powerful way:
patients can understand what’s happening, ask questions, and make informed decisions.

When patients feel heard and informed, the ER becomes less intimidating. Tech can’t replace empathybut it can make empathy easier to deliver at scale,
especially on the busiest nights when everyone is running on adrenaline and cafeteria coffee.

Bringing it together: technology that feels like care, not clutter

The best ER technologies share a goal: reduce risk, reduce confusion, and reduce friction.
When records are connected, teams can treat faster and safer. When updates are clearer, waiting feels less stressful.
When virtual care and accessibility tools are used well, patients feel more supported and less lost.

Of course, technology isn’t magic. Bad implementations can frustrate staff and patients alike.
But when the tools are designed around real workflowsand when clinicians can keep their focus on people, not pop-upstechnology in the ER can
genuinely boost the patient experience.
Sources:

In other words: the goal isn’t an ER that feels like a spaceship. It’s an ER that feels like a place where the right things happen reliably,
and you’re never left wondering what happens next.

Experiences from the ER: what these technologies feel like as a patient (and family)

To make this more real, here are common experience patterns patients and families describebased on how modern ED workflows tend to play out when technology is
used thoughtfully. These are illustrative composites (not individual stories), but they reflect the kinds of moments that shape whether an ER visit feels chaotic
or cared-for.

The “I’m still waiting, but I’m not panicking” text update

One of the strangest parts of the ER is that waiting can feel like nothing is happeningeven when a lot is happening behind the scenes.
Patients often say the hardest part isn’t the time itself; it’s the uncertainty. A text update, a status screen, or a quick digital note that says,
“Your bloodwork is in process; imaging is next,” can turn the wait from a blank void into a timeline with steps.

Families notice this too. Instead of imagining worst-case scenarios, they can anchor their expectations:
“Okay, labs first. Then the doctor. Then we’ll know.” It’s not that anyone loves waiting. It’s that being kept informed feels respectful.

The “beep” that builds trust

Patients don’t always know what BCMA isand frankly, nobody should need a glossary while wearing a paper gown.
But people do notice when a nurse scans a wristband and scans a medication. That small ritual can feel like, “They’re checking. They’re careful.”
In a place where you’re vulnerable and possibly scared, visible safety steps build confidence.

There’s also a subtle emotional benefit: patients feel less like a “room number” and more like a person whose identity matters.
(And yes, the nurse may still ask your name and birthday right after scanningbecause redundancy is how safety systems stay safe.)

The early evaluation that changes the whole tone of the visit

Many patients describe a turning point in the visit: the moment it feels like care is actually underway.
When virtual triage or “provider in triage” models work well, that turning point happens earlier. Even a brief initial evaluation can help:
pain relief started sooner, labs ordered quickly, an EKG performed without delay, or reassurance that symptoms don’t signal something immediately life-threatening.

The total visit may still take hoursbecause medicine takes time. But patients often say, “At least things started moving.”
That forward motion matters for comfort and confidence.

The discharge instructions you can actually follow

The end of the ER visit can be a blur: relief, exhaustion, maybe embarrassment about how dramatic your symptoms felt at 2 a.m. (Don’t worryER staff have seen it all.)
Digital discharge instructions, patient portals, and electronic summaries can help patients revisit what they were told when their brain is finally back online.

Patients often appreciate being able to check medication changes, follow-up steps, and warning signs laterespecially if they were groggy, in pain,
or juggling a worried child or older parent. When information is easier to access, patients are more likely to do the right next step:
follow up with primary care, fill the prescription correctly, or return if symptoms worsen.

The most human moment: understanding

Technology is at its best when it helps patients understand. Whether that’s interpreter access, clearer written plans, or consistent updates,
the emotional “win” is the same: patients feel less alone in a stressful environment. They feel oriented.
And in the ER, feeling oriented is a form of comfortalmost as valuable as a warm blanket that’s actually warm.

SEO tags (JSON)

The post 3 ways technology in the ER boosts the patient experience appeared first on Quotes Today.